Is it time to SELL the landfill and UTILIZE the money on other projects?Cask flow cash chips leverage
Posted 12 September 2015 - 04:09 PM
Posted 13 September 2015 - 08:40 AM
A certain current "perennial candidate" needs to fully READ the EXLOSIVE
Indiana State Board of Accounts audit of the landfill
before he continues to defend the status quo
situation of the landfill.
He might be a little sharper.
Posted 13 September 2015 - 08:47 AM
If the commissioners can fully explain that it's best for the taxpayers to sell. I'm in!
Posted 13 September 2015 - 08:53 AM
Dern Pesky Details Report
The vaunted, oft-quoted breakfast discussions have revealed
that in addition to some wise Republican leaders,
one major Clark County Democrat shaker and mover,
who has a strong record of accomplishments,
may be joining the discussion
that an intelligent analysis
of the best way to proceed to solve the landfill mess should be undertaken!
This former office holder, who has accomplished quite a great deal
may be joining WITH the Republican leadership
to analyze the economic benefits that can
be obtained from the operation
of the landfill, the recycling revision, and the landfill gas.
The former Democrat office holder and still current leader has accomplished
far more than the "perennial political candidate"
and understands the bad situation
can be corrected with
the proper action.
Edited by Savile Row, 13 September 2015 - 09:19 AM.
Posted 13 September 2015 - 09:16 AM
that selling the landfill is just one potential aspect of improvement.
Focusing upon a complete new economic analysis,
not 'shrilling attacking citizens'
who suggest ways out of the mess
......is a much better path.
The Indiana SBOA audit may be painful for some office holders
and a politician may attempt to defend it,
but it is pretty bad.
"An office holder trying so hard to become the current public face
of the audit and defending the past practices and actions
The questions must be asked, the audit not hidden or covered up.
Conducting a careful economic analysis of potential improvements
examining possible sales,
possible public-private partnerships, etc.,
not promoting demeaning obfuscation,
is much more beneficial
to the taxpayers.
Edited by Savile Row, 13 September 2015 - 10:13 AM.
Posted 13 September 2015 - 09:37 AM
" TT "
always slick Pesty Version 2
has posted for the CCC readers...."tt"....
So, we are now subtly requested
by the SlickMeister brother Pesty to try to ascertain just what-the-heck
is he trying to teach us now.....
Edited by Savile Row, 13 September 2015 - 09:52 AM.
Posted 13 September 2015 - 11:39 AM
The Top Definition of RR:
"The most popular meaning of RR is: 'Reply Required' ".
Posted 14 September 2015 - 12:37 PM
The methane gas collection system was fully financed by Hoosier Energy (i.e., no capital outlay by the County). The captured gas is sold on the open market and the funds are used to pay down the HE loan. It will be several years before this debt is fully satisfied. In addition, an extension of the collection system will need to be constructed within the footprint of the current improvements before the vertical deposit of municipal solid waste commences.
Posted 14 September 2015 - 01:12 PM
Curmudgeon is a very
intelligent person with a lot of knowledge and ability.
It might be wise to include him on the committee if it is created.
Posted 16 September 2015 - 08:04 PM
Maybe Steve Voelker should also be added to the proposed analysis committee!
He is an informed and intelligent person. Both he and Curmudgeon
along with some sharp businesspersons
who have run a company would be a nice blend.
That would add a good viewpoint to the possible changes!
Edited by Savile Row, 16 September 2015 - 08:05 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users