Jump to content



Photo

more stupid


  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

#21 Savile Row

Savile Row

    Key Club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,922 posts

Posted 05 May 2015 - 03:08 PM

There is no need to become so angry and abusive.

:wacko:The question presented is really very polite and very simple.

How many  elected officials right now on the council are double dipping

or have done so in the past? Have deals have been cut

for paying jobs?

 

It is really time to disclose.

No need to become mean about it

even if you are worried....

Be civil. Just tell us....

Pretty please...

 

:poke: :pirate:


Edited by Savile Row, 05 May 2015 - 03:27 PM.


#22 Not Super But Honest Mike

Not Super But Honest Mike

    Local Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,711 posts

Posted 05 May 2015 - 03:57 PM

savile, looks like you are the only one with the scoop....or the poop....so just tell us what rumors you have heard.


  • Donna likes this

#23 IntegrityMatters

IntegrityMatters

    Key Club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,995 posts

Posted 05 May 2015 - 04:00 PM

I know certain subdivisions will not allow signs --- how do they get away with it?

#24 Savile Row

Savile Row

    Key Club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,922 posts

Posted 05 May 2015 - 04:01 PM

'Ol S-R is  just humbly asking a simple question

and some persons  seem to have
very suddenly  become

defensive and sorta,

kinda angry....

:unsure:

 

.


Edited by Savile Row, 05 May 2015 - 04:04 PM.


#25 Savile Row

Savile Row

    Key Club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,922 posts

Posted 05 May 2015 - 04:08 PM

IM, it seems that the traditional political lore

in Indiana is that some counties are very big on signs

and others not that much. The general consensus is that rather

than overly retrict free speech, it has been thought to be much better

to allow persons to  openly express themselves  through  yard signs, etc.


Edited by Savile Row, 05 May 2015 - 04:11 PM.

  • Donna likes this

#26 kelley

kelley

    Local Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,120 posts

Posted 05 May 2015 - 04:26 PM

I know certain subdivisions will not allow signs --- how do they get away with it?


It's a little different if you agreed to the covenants and restrictions when purchasing, but I believe some HOA restrictions have also been successfully challenged. Generally, political speech on private property is protected.
  • IntegrityMatters and Donna like this

#27 Donna

Donna

    Local Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,465 posts

Posted 05 May 2015 - 10:30 PM

SR, it wasn't anger . . . I've asked the same thing.



#28 Savile Row

Savile Row

    Key Club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,922 posts

Posted 06 May 2015 - 06:22 AM

Donna,

some who

are angry with

the question most

likely know the answer

in detail and could  be "too close"

to the double dipping issue to give us

an accurate response. It seems that rather

than come clean with the voters, they want to

continue the obfuscation. It is similar to the soccer

spending issue at the questionable Woerhle Field location.

I don't think that they want to tell us because they do not want the public to know.

 

:pirate: :sweat:


Edited by Savile Row, 06 May 2015 - 06:23 AM.


#29 Not Super But Honest Mike

Not Super But Honest Mike

    Local Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,711 posts

Posted 06 May 2015 - 06:25 AM

no anger on my part, I just don't like guessing games by un informed people... If ya got something to say spell it out.


  • Donna likes this

#30 Savile Row

Savile Row

    Key Club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,922 posts

Posted 06 May 2015 - 06:29 AM

The question has been politely asked.

The question remains on the table.

It  does need to be "spelled out"....for sure.

The public is waiting.

:popcorn:


Edited by Savile Row, 06 May 2015 - 06:39 AM.


#31 Donna

Donna

    Local Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,465 posts

Posted 06 May 2015 - 05:13 PM

Ya know, SR, your feather & tease posts have become tiresome.  If you know something, say it.


  • GrumpyGranny likes this

#32 IntegrityMatters

IntegrityMatters

    Key Club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,995 posts

Posted 06 May 2015 - 05:29 PM

Boy this sure sounds like the current GCCS admin who also doesn't want the public to know anything ---- the more we know, the more us poor imbeciles might question them!    It is not nice to question Mother Nature!! (or GCCS or the City Council!)


  • snowman likes this

#33 Donna

Donna

    Local Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,465 posts

Posted 06 May 2015 - 05:45 PM

:goodpost:  IM! 

 

We imbeciles are an inconvenient lot.


  • IntegrityMatters, snowman and JenS like this

#34 hillbilly highway

hillbilly highway

    Councilman

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 531 posts

Posted 06 May 2015 - 09:47 PM

The question has been politely asked.
The question remains on the table.
It does need to be "spelled out"....for sure.
The public is waiting.
:popcorn:

You don't know anything your just grasping at straws. I'm done with the BS!!!

Edited by hillbilly highway, 06 May 2015 - 09:48 PM.


#35 Not Super But Honest Mike

Not Super But Honest Mike

    Local Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,711 posts

Posted 06 May 2015 - 10:40 PM

I got it!!!!

 

moore hired teresa  perkins to steal the election for him???



#36 Pesty Version 2

Pesty Version 2

    Commissioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,953 posts

Posted 06 May 2015 - 11:52 PM

You guys crack me up.   

 

SR  asks a question and the thread loses it.


  • Sunflower70 likes this

#37 Savile Row

Savile Row

    Key Club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,922 posts

Posted 07 May 2015 - 05:15 AM

"I don't think that they want to tell us because they do not want the public to know."






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users