Jump to content



Photo

Hillary Clinton


  • Please log in to reply
1269 replies to this topic

#41 CityBoy

CityBoy

    Councilman

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 970 posts

Posted 23 May 2015 - 02:01 PM

 

Interesting way to run a campaign... too scared to speak... pretty sad... I hope people are paying close attention... 

 

What she says when she deigns to speak is what really scares me.  For example:

 

When speaking about people who oppose abortion, she said, “Deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.”

 

Damned if I want any Clinton, much less Hillary, to use the Presidency to set about changing Americans' cultural codes and religious beliefs.


Edited by CityBoy, 23 May 2015 - 02:02 PM.

  • jiyabird and woo like this

#42 snowman

snowman

    Local Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,673 posts

Posted 24 May 2015 - 07:11 AM

Didn't see anything in her comments about abortion.  It was a speech on several topics and here is what you  are referring to. Where's the part about aboriton?

 

 
 

NEW YORK — Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton took a feminist tone on Thursday. She told attendees at the sixth annual Women in The World Summit that “deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed” for the sake of giving women access to “reproductive health care and safe childbirth.”

“Far too many women are denied access to reproductive health care and safe childbirth, and laws don’t count for much if they’re not enforced. Rights have to exist in practice — not just on paper,” Clinton said.

"Laws have to be backed up with resources and political will,” she explained. “And deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed. As I have said and as I believe, the advancement of the full participation of women and girls in every aspect of their societies is the great unfinished business of the 21st century and not just for women but for everyone — and not just in far away countries but right here in the United States.”

Clinton also took a shot at Republicans who oppose amnesty legislation, saying, “There are those who offer themselves as leaders who would deport mothers working to give their children a better life, rather than risk the ire of talk radio.”

 


  • Donna likes this

#43 Quasar

Quasar

    Dux Ducis

  • Administrators
  • 6,636 posts

Posted 24 July 2015 - 01:46 PM

Interesting... The POTUS isn't ever going to let this happen... so we'll never know for sure... interesting though... 

 

WASHINGTON — Two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state, senior government officials said Thursday.
 
The request follows an assessment in a June 29 memo by the inspectors general for the State Department and the intelligence agencies that Mrs. Clinton's private account contained "hundreds of potentially classified emails." The memo was written to Patrick F. Kennedy, the under secretary of state for management.
 


#44 jiyabird

jiyabird

    Local Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,037 posts

Posted 25 July 2015 - 11:24 AM

Want some more of Obama's horrors? Elect Hillary and watch it get worse!

#45 Quasar

Quasar

    Dux Ducis

  • Administrators
  • 6,636 posts

Posted 27 July 2015 - 06:22 PM

Pretty amusing today... watching Clinton attacking republicans for not having any women in the race... Then correcting her stupid comment... AND adding that they only have one running!

Lol...

#46 Quasar

Quasar

    Dux Ducis

  • Administrators
  • 6,636 posts

Posted 03 August 2015 - 07:30 AM

It's a good question... why hasn't the DOJ initiated a criminal investigation of Clinton?... Petraeus was convicted for far less... Just another case of the ruling elite being above the law? 

 

“I don’t see how the Justice Department would be able to avoid at least investigating this,” said Kevin Carroll, a former CIA officer and secrecy lawyer in Washington. “What Petraeus did was really small in comparison, because there was no exposure of any information to any foreign intelligence services.”

 

Mr. Petraeus pleaded guilty to improperly handling hard-copy binders of classified military files and sharing them with his mistress and biographer.
 
“In contrast,” said Mr. Carroll, “it’s certain that foreign intelligence services had access to the stuff on Hillary Clinton’s email.”
 
“Information put on her home-cooked server and then sent around to other accounts is a very, very serious counterintelligence breach, and they’re going to have to have a really substantial look at the damage that’s been done to every agency that’s had its intelligence compromised,”
 


#47 Donna

Donna

    Local Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,449 posts

Posted 03 August 2015 - 07:44 AM

But, Petraeus handing "classified information" to his mistress and biographer is no biggie.  No, there's no bias here, folks!


  • cindiloohoo likes this

#48 Quasar

Quasar

    Dux Ducis

  • Administrators
  • 6,636 posts

Posted 03 August 2015 - 07:48 AM

But, Petraeus handing "classified information" to his mistress and biographer is no biggie.  No, there's no bias here, folks!

 

I didn't say that... he was very wrong and has paid the price for it. 

 

What I am saying... is that In comparison, what Clinton has done is far worse and Clinton and many of the people that support her have turned a blind eye to this... 


  • CityBoy likes this

#49 Serve

Serve

    Councilman

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 682 posts

Posted 03 August 2015 - 07:52 AM

But, Petraeus handing "classified information" to his mistress and biographer is no biggie.  No, there's no bias here, folks!

 

 

umm....He resigned his position, he was investigated by the FBI, charged and convicted of "mishandling classified materials".....  So...  yea your right... no bias here, folks.. haha


Edited by Serve, 03 August 2015 - 07:54 AM.

  • kelley, Quasar and MoeMomma like this

#50 woo

woo

    Key Club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,720 posts

Posted 03 August 2015 - 07:57 AM

 

It's a good question... why hasn't the DOJ initiated a criminal investigation of Clinton?...

 

They are probably afraid she will cast an evil spell on them and send out her flying monkeys.....



#51 gettin-at-it

gettin-at-it

    ACCOUNT CLOSED

  • Account Closed
  • PipPip
  • 81 posts

Posted 03 August 2015 - 09:14 PM

If I understand correctly, if snowden or manning do it, it's espionage and jail time. If Hillary does it, it was a mistake and she didn't mean it or what difference does it make. Nice double standard. And, no, if it's not classified and later classified, it doesn't matter. Ask Tom Drake if it does.
  • kelley likes this

#52 Oldgoat

Oldgoat

    Commissioner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1,980 posts

Posted 03 August 2015 - 09:45 PM

https://scontent-iad...585&oe=5650BBB5

 

11231849_10153623324897625_3837277546366


  • GrumpyGranny and jiyabird like this

#53 snowman

snowman

    Local Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,673 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 05:49 AM

Hillary Clinton was following the protocols that had been in place for years regarding emails for the Secretary of State. 



#54 woo

woo

    Key Club

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,720 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 06:36 AM

Hillary Clinton was following the protocols that had been in place for years regarding emails for the Secretary of State. 

But not the laws correct?

If someone else robs a store, it's okay for me to rob one also?


  • CityBoy likes this

#55 snowman

snowman

    Local Legend

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,673 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 07:11 AM

But not the laws correct?

If someone else robs a store, it's okay for me to rob one also?

 

what law?



#56 Quasar

Quasar

    Dux Ducis

  • Administrators
  • 6,636 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 07:29 AM

When you look at the big picture of all this woman has done wrong over the years... I'm stunned that anyone can support her for POTUS. 


  • GrumpyGranny, CityBoy and jiyabird like this

#57 GrumpyGranny

GrumpyGranny

    Local Legend

  • Administrators
  • 5,155 posts

Posted 04 August 2015 - 09:06 AM

 

Of course he is...she let him "date" even while they lived in the White House! 


  • kelley, Quasar, CityBoy and 3 others like this

#58 Quasar

Quasar

    Dux Ducis

  • Administrators
  • 6,636 posts

Posted 05 August 2015 - 07:00 AM

This is an interesting development... maybe now we will get some truthful answers regarding what happened here... 

 

FBI looking into the security of Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail setup

 

The FBI has begun looking into the security of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private e-mail setup, contacting in the past week a Denver-based technology firm that helped manage the unusual system, according to two government officials.
 
Also last week, the FBI contacted Clinton’s lawyer, David Ken­dall, with questions about the security of a thumb drive in his possession that contains copies of work e-mails Clinton sent during her time as secretary of state.
 
The FBI’s interest in Clinton’s e-mail system comes after the intelligence community’s inspector general referred the issue to the Justice Department in July. Intelligence officials expressed concern that some sensitive information was not in the government’s possession and could be “compromised.” The referral did not accuse Clinton of any wrongdoing, and the two officials said Tuesday that the FBI is not targeting her.
 


#59 CityBoy

CityBoy

    Councilman

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 970 posts

Posted 05 August 2015 - 07:31 AM

DRIP, DRIP, DRIP.

#60 porkypine

porkypine

    Resident

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 134 posts

Posted 06 August 2015 - 08:15 AM

NO OSMA

NO OBAMA

NO CHELSA'S MAMA


  • jiyabird likes this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users