Clark County Airport Screws Up Again
#201
Posted 06 December 2012 - 09:55 AM
Did it state how much of that is the average taxpayer's cut?
#202
Posted 06 December 2012 - 10:42 AM
Then again, there could be some advantage to Clark County taxpayers in the future in reduced taxes if this becomes a bigger impact on the area, so an increase in taxes now to fund it doesn't seem out of the question entirely.
#204
Posted 06 December 2012 - 05:45 PM
kelley, on 06 December 2012 - 09:55 AM, said:
Did it state how much of that is the average taxpayer's cut?
http://www.courier-j...-economic-study
#205
Posted 06 December 2012 - 09:05 PM
Orange Guzzi, on 05 December 2012 - 10:27 PM, said:
#206
Posted 06 December 2012 - 10:49 PM
Curmudgeon, on 06 December 2012 - 09:05 PM, said:
No they don't. An existing business that wants to make an additional investment in their real estate improvements or equipment (i.e., creating an additional tax assessment) is equally eligible to seek tax abatement as a company seeking to locate here for the first time.
Like your sign off, much better than out-dated Mitch (will Kentucky ditch?) McConnell out-dated quote!
#207
Posted 07 December 2012 - 07:56 AM
#208
Posted 07 December 2012 - 01:06 PM
#209
Posted 07 December 2012 - 03:59 PM
#210
Posted 08 December 2012 - 02:07 PM
Like has been stated before, pay the right person(s) the right amount to put a spin on a report and they can make anything sound like a good deal.
#211
Posted 10 December 2012 - 05:38 PM
The Clark County Airport has not received any matching funds from the County in years. They have been self-sufficient and have covered the County’s obligations to the Federal Government grant assurance agreement.
So you see aircraft owners have paid for the airport. Research the economic impact the airport has on our community and see what Aviation contributes to the local economy.
Those who oppose the Airport, I suggest you put your head between your legs and prepare for a crash landing.
#212
Posted 10 December 2012 - 06:03 PM
iceman, on 10 December 2012 - 05:38 PM, said:
#213
Posted 10 December 2012 - 09:44 PM
At some point you have to invest in the future. Would you still be complaining if Boeing had chosen a site on the Airport a few years back? Had the runway have been longer the airport would have been more attractive to them. You have to be ready when opportunity knocks. You can’t expect Companies to wait 10 years for runways to be expanded. You need to have infrastructure in place to lure much needed jobs. Would you complain if you or a family member had gotten a good paying job at Boeing?
If you really want answers, go to the Air Board meetings, with so many new board members there will be a lot of information revisited to bring the new members up to speed.
If the Feds and State knocked on your door and offered you .97 cents for every .03 cents you spent to improve your property value,
would you say no?
Your support and contribution to the future economic growth of the community is needed.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












